linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS || ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:36:20 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS ||
 ARCH_MXC

On 7/11/22 11:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Freescale/NXP i.MX LCDIF and eLCDIF LCD controllers are only present on
> Freescale/NXP i.MX SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MXS ||
> ARCH_MXC, to prevent asking the user about this driver when configuring
> a kernel without Freescale/NXP i.MX support.
> 
> Fixes: 45d59d704080cc0c ("drm: Add new driver for MXSFB controller")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Is the Fixes tag really justified in this case ?

Otherwise

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>