[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90c85105-b9f4-e7cb-fa93-17127b3b369d@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:41:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...exp.org>,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, khilman@...libre.com, abailon@...libre.com,
amitk@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 31/33] thermal/drivers/samsung: Switch to new of
thermal API
On 10/07/2022 23:24, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The thermal OF code has a new API allowing to migrate the OF
> initialization to a simpler approach.
>
> Use this new API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...exp.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index f4ab4c5b4b62..2bd7b3b57b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -650,9 +650,9 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
> writel(con, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL);
> }
>
> -static int exynos_get_temp(void *p, int *temp)
> +static int exynos_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> {
> - struct exynos_tmu_data *data = p;
> + struct exynos_tmu_data *data = tz->devdata;
> int value, ret = 0;
>
> if (!data || !data->tmu_read)
> @@ -728,9 +728,9 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct exynos_tmu_data *data,
> writel(val, data->base + emul_con);
> }
>
> -static int exynos_tmu_set_emulation(void *drv_data, int temp)
> +static int exynos_tmu_set_emulation(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int temp)
> {
> - struct exynos_tmu_data *data = drv_data;
> + struct exynos_tmu_data *data = tz->devdata;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210)
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_set_emulation(void *drv_data, int temp)
> }
> #else
> #define exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation NULL
> -static int exynos_tmu_set_emulation(void *drv_data, int temp)
> +static int exynos_tmu_set_emulation(struct thermal_zone *tz, int temp)
> { return -EINVAL; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION */
>
> @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops exynos_sensor_ops = {
> +static struct thermal_zone_device_ops exynos_sensor_ops = {
> .get_temp = exynos_get_temp,
> .set_emul_temp = exynos_tmu_set_emulation,
> };
> @@ -1091,8 +1091,8 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * data->tzd must be registered before calling exynos_tmu_initialize(),
> * requesting irq and calling exynos_tmu_control().
> */
> - data->tzd = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, 0, data,
> - &exynos_sensor_ops);
> + data->tzd = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(&pdev->dev, 0, data,
> + &exynos_sensor_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(data->tzd)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(data->tzd);
> if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> err_thermal:
> - thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev, data->tzd);
> + thermal_of_zone_unregister(data->tzd);
You use now devm, so this should not be needed.
> err_sclk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(data->sclk);
> err_clk:
> @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct thermal_zone_device *tzd = data->tzd;
>
> - thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev, tzd);
> + thermal_of_zone_unregister(tzd);
This as well.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists