linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:08:53 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <brgl@...ev.pl>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
        <Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91

On 11/07/2022 13:03, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 at 10:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> The SAMA5D2 PIOBU is only present on some AT91/Microchip SoCs.  Hence
>> add a dependency on ARCH_AT91, to prevent asking the user about this
>> driver when configuring a kernel without AT91/Microchip SoC support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> 
> Looks good to me:
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> 
> I'm adding to the thread my colleagues from lan966 and mpfs if it
> happens that they use this same IP on their SoC. Anyway, we can
> add them afterwards.

Not on FPGAs, so you're safe there!