[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220711122503.286743-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:25:00 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, weiyi.lu@...iatek.com,
mbrugger@...e.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
nfraprado@...labora.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mtk-pm-domains: Use 'syscon' phandle for SCPSYS regmap
After an attempt by MediaTek to upstream MT8186, MT8192 and MT8195
devicetrees, Krzysztof brought up a discussion in which it emerged
that the usage of a 'simple-mfd' device is not an optimal choice for
a number of reasons [1].
Reading that made me just write this simple code to stop nesting the
SPM power-controller node inside of a "syscon", "simple-mfd" node,
also allowing to move it outside of the main soc bus.
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220704100028.19932-9-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com/
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (3):
dt-bindings: power: mediatek: Document phandle to SCPSYS syscon node
dt-bindings: power: mediatek: Update example to use phandle to syscon
soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Grab SCPSYS registers from phandle to
syscon
.../power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml | 130 +++++++++---------
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 16 ++-
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists