lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:20:57 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: e500: Fix compilation with gcc e500 compiler



Le 10/07/2022 à 19:57, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> On Sunday 10 July 2022 17:38:33 Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Le 09/07/2022 à 12:23, Pali Rohár a écrit :
>>>>>     
>>>>> -ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>>>>>     ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>>>>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=power8
>>>>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power9,-mtune=power8)
>>>>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += -mcpu=power8
>>>>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power9,-mtune=power8)
>>>>>     else
>>>>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power7,$(call cc-option,-mtune=power5))
>>>>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mcpu=power5,-mcpu=power4)
>>>>> -endif
>>>>> -else ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64
>>>>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=powerpc64
>>>>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power7,$(call cc-option,-mtune=power5))
>>>>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call cc-option,-mcpu=power5,-mcpu=power4)
>>>>
>>>> So before that change I got -mcpu=power9
>>>>
>>>> Now I get -mtune=power7 -mcpu=power5 -mcpu=power9
>>>
>>> I did it like Arnd wrote.
>>>
>>> And seems that it does not work and now is fully out of the scope of the
>>> original issue. Now I'm really lost here.
>>>
>>> So I nobody comes with better solution, I would prefer to stick with my
>>> original version which targets _only_ e500 cores.
>>>
>>> Any other suggestion?
>>
>> I sent a patch based on the TARGET_CPU logic, does it work for you ?
>>
>> Christophe
> 
> Perfect, it works! Thank you.
> 

Thanks.

I sent a series including this patch with your comments taken into account.

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists