linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/230] 5.15.54-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:00:33 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/230] 5.15.54-rc1 review

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:14, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 11/07/2022 10:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.54 release.
> > There are 230 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:05:28 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.54-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > -------------
> > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>
> ...
>
> > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> >      irqchip/gic-v3: Ensure pseudo-NMIs have an ISB between ack and handling
>
>
> The above change is missing a semi-colon and so is causing the following
> build error ...
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c: In function 'gic_handle_nmi':
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c:666:2: error: expected ';' before 'err'
>    err = handle_domain_nmi(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
>    ^~~
>
> > Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
> >      bpf, arm64: Use emit_addr_mov_i64() for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC
>
> And the above commit is generating the following build error ...
>
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'build_insn':
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:791:7: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'bpf_pseudo_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn))
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> These are seen with ARM64 builds.

I have also noticed these failures on arm64 and arm.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

- Naresh

>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> --
> nvpublic