linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: prevent page_frag_alloc() from corrupting the memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKgT0UedQL-Yeum8m=j6oX5s2SjzjtwcwFXBZQde+FzmkmL5bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:34:26 -0700
From:   Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To:     Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Chen Lin <chen45464546@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: prevent page_frag_alloc() from corrupting the memory

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:52 AM Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> A number of drivers call page_frag_alloc() with a
> fragment's size > PAGE_SIZE.
> In low memory conditions, __page_frag_cache_refill() may fail the order 3
> cache allocation and fall back to order 0;
> If this happens, the cache will be smaller than the fragment, causing
> memory corruptions.
>
> Prevent this from happening by checking if the newly allocated cache
> is large enough for the fragment; if not, the allocation will fail
> and page_frag_alloc() will return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e008a3df0485..7fb000d7e90c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5611,12 +5611,17 @@ void *page_frag_alloc_align(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
>                 /* if size can vary use size else just use PAGE_SIZE */
>                 size = nc->size;
>  #endif
> -               /* OK, page count is 0, we can safely set it */
> -               set_page_count(page, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE + 1);
> -
>                 /* reset page count bias and offset to start of new frag */
>                 nc->pagecnt_bias = PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE + 1;
>                 offset = size - fragsz;
> +               if (unlikely(offset < 0)) {
> +                       free_the_page(page, compound_order(page));
> +                       nc->va = NULL;
> +                       return NULL;
> +               }
> +
> +               /* OK, page count is 0, we can safely set it */
> +               set_page_count(page, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE + 1);
>         }
>
>         nc->pagecnt_bias--;

Rather than forcing us to free the page it might be better to move the
lines getting the size and computing the offset to the top of the "if
(unlikely(offset < 0)) {" block. Then instead of freeing the page we
could just return NULL and don't have to change the value of any
fields in the page_frag_cache.

That way a driver performing bad requests can't force us to start
allocating and freeing pages like mad by repeatedly flushing the
cache.