[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1249136-ac01-c873-f61b-0c8e812909bd@mailbox.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:28:50 +0200
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/fourcc: Add missing big-endian XRGB1555 and
RGB565 formats
On 2022-07-11 17:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Michel,
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 5:23 PM Michel Dänzer
> <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org> wrote:
>> On 2022-07-08 20:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> As of commit eae06120f1974e1a ("drm: refuse ADDFB2 ioctl for broken
>>> bigendian drivers"), drivers must set the
>>> quirk_addfb_prefer_host_byte_order quirk to make the drm_mode_addfb()
>>> compat code work correctly on big-endian machines.
>>>
>>> While that works fine for big-endian XRGB8888 and ARGB8888, which are
>>> mapped to the existing little-endian BGRX8888 and BGRA8888 formats, it
>>> does not work for big-endian XRGB1555 and RGB565, as the latter are not
>>> listed in the format database.
>>>
>>> Fix this by adding the missing formats. Limit this to big-endian
>>> platforms, as there is currently no need to support these formats on
>>> little-endian platforms.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6960e6da9cec3f66 ("drm: fix drm_mode_addfb() on big endian machines.")
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> ---
>>> Cirrus is the only driver setting quirk_addfb_prefer_host_byte_order
>>> and supporting RGB565 or XRGB1555, but no one tried that on big-endian?
>>> Cirrus does not support DRM_FORMAT_RGB565 | DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN
>>> in cirrus_fb_create, so you cannot get a graphical text console.
>>>
>>> Do we need these definitions on little-endian platforms, too?
>>> Would it be better to use "DRM_FORMAT_{XRGB1555,RGB565} |
>>> DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN" instead of "DRM_FORMAT_HOST_{XRGB1555,RGB565}" in
>>> formats[]?
>>
>> The intention of DRM_FORMAT_HOST_* is that they are macros in include/drm/drm_fourcc.h which just map to little endian formats defined in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c. Since this is not possible for big endian hosts for XRGB1555 or RGB565 (or any other format with non-8-bit components), this isn't applicable here.
>
> I read that as that you prefer to write
> "DRM_FORMAT_{XRGB1555,RGB565} | DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN" in formats[]?
In other drivers for hardware which can access these formats as big endian, yes.
Note that AFAIK little if any user-space code uses DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN yet though.
>> It's also doubtful that Cirrus hardware would access these formats as big endian (drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/cirrus.c has no endianness references at all, and the hardware was surely designed for x86 first and foremost).
>>
>> Instead, fbcon (and user space) needs to convert to little endian when using DRM_FORMAT_HOST_{XRGB1555,RGB565} with the cirrus driver on big endian hosts.
>
> Yeah, probably the cirrus driver can use some fixes...
I suspect the fix here would rather need to be in the DRM glue code for fbcon than in the driver. Or maybe some kind of byte-swapping helper(s) which can be used by drivers.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and Xwayland developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists