linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:21:16 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
        katie.morris@...advantage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over
 SPI

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the
> > weekend? Anyone still planning to review?  
> 
> As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would.

Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference,
looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'.

> I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for
> other sub-system maintainers to pull from.
> 
> If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to.
> However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch
> to pull from.

Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan.
If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do.

Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above
merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag. 
Just in  case my goldfish brain forgets.