linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: fix the chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcHVJu2bX_qWKf84e2t=FrNRvsRLnEXirRKVPh=kZz=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:49:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: fix the chip_name configfs item

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 7:35 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> The chip_name configs attribute always displays the device name of the
> first GPIO bank because the logic of the relevant function is simply
> wrong.
>
> Fix it by correctly comparing the bank's swnode against the GPIO
> device's children.
>
> Fixes: cb8c474e79be ("gpio: sim: new testing module")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>

...

>  struct gpio_sim_chip_name_ctx {
> -       struct gpio_sim_device *dev;
> +       struct fwnode_handle *swnode;

I would call it fwnode even if we know the backend provider.

>         char *page;
>  };

...

>         struct fwnode_handle *swnode;

Do you still need this? See below.

...

>         swnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
>
> +       if (swnode == ctx->swnode)
> +               return sprintf(ctx->page, "%s\n", dev_name(dev));

So, now it can be

if (device_match_fwnode(dev, ctx->fwnode))
  return sprintf(...);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko