linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220711132243.76275f03800fc612589b3225@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:22:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        elver@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, vschneid@...hat.com,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 08:51:08 +0200 Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:

> > > can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, and to
> > > include Yury's tags?
> > 
> > I already added Yury's ack.  Please tell me the specific patch ordering
> > and I'll take care of that.
> > 
> 
> The updated patch order should be:
>    x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
>    cpumask: add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
>    cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption
>    lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite
>    cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature
> 
> Reordering the patches on my tree didn't produce any conflicts.

Got it, thanks.