[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220711230825.GA441389-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:08:25 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] of: unittest: make unittest_gpio_remove()
consistent with unittest_gpio_probe()
On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 00:45:39 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On the ->remove() stage the callback uses physical device node instead of one
> from GPIO chip and the variable name which is different to one used in
> unittest_gpio_probe(). Make these consistent with unittest_gpio_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v2: no changes
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists