[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220711083829.GD6084@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:38:29 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Make phys_to_virt utilize __va()
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 01:37:42PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> The implementation is exactly the same, so avoid open-coding it in two
> different locations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/io.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/io.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/io.h
> index 6f5c86d2bab4..880048a54362 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t virt_to_phys(const volatile void *x)
> */
> static inline void * phys_to_virt(unsigned long address)
> {
> - return (void *)(address + PAGE_OFFSET - PHYS_OFFSET);
> + return __va(address);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists