[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220711090542.940872889@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:07:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nick Child <nnac123@...ux.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 40/55] ibmvnic: Properly dispose of all skbs during a failover.
From: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 1b18f09d31cfa7148df15a7d5c5e0e86f105f7d1 ]
During a reset, there may have been transmits in flight that are no
longer valid and cannot be fulfilled. Resetting and clearing the
queues is insufficient; each skb also needs to be explicitly freed
so that upper levels are not left waiting for confirmation of a
transmit that will never happen. If this happens frequently enough,
the apparent backlog will cause TCP to begin "congestion control"
unnecessarily, culminating in permanently decreased throughput.
Fixes: d7c0ef36bde03 ("ibmvnic: Free and re-allocate scrqs when tx/rx scrqs change")
Tested-by: Nick Child <nnac123@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index 61fb2a092451..7fe2e47dc83d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -5228,6 +5228,15 @@ static int ibmvnic_reset_init(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, bool reset)
release_sub_crqs(adapter, 0);
rc = init_sub_crqs(adapter);
} else {
+ /* no need to reinitialize completely, but we do
+ * need to clean up transmits that were in flight
+ * when we processed the reset. Failure to do so
+ * will confound the upper layer, usually TCP, by
+ * creating the illusion of transmits that are
+ * awaiting completion.
+ */
+ clean_tx_pools(adapter);
+
rc = reset_sub_crq_queues(adapter);
}
} else {
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists