lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADiBU3-ca=YMskJnp++sUHS7fTVb41prUzRtPdhJ_rrnYdzfkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:43:39 +0800
From:   ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] input: misc: rt5120: Add power key support

Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> 於 2022年7月9日 週六 中午12:53寫道:
>
> Hi ChiYuan,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 06:01:44PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > +
> > +     is_pressed = !(stat & RT5120_PWRKEYSTAT_MASK);
> > +
> > +     if ((is_pressed && irq == priv->press_irq) ||
> > +         (!is_pressed  && irq == priv->release_irq)) {
> > +             input_report_key(priv->input, KEY_POWER, is_pressed);
> > +             input_sync(priv->input);
> > +     }
> > +
>
> What is the reason for checking both the status and interrupt? Can we
> simply say:
>
Just to make sure 'press/release' to matche the current state.
In the IC design, it already guarantee press/release interrupt with 50
millisecond debounce time.
But if irq is delayed handling, press and release irq will all be checked.
Although irq is one by one, but in that case, pwrkey button up will be
reported twice.
I'm not sure whether this case exists or not.
>
>         input_report_key(priv->input, KEY_POWER,
>                          !(stat & RT5120_PWRKEYSTAT_MASK));
>         input_sync(priv->input);
>
> ?
>
Yes, but how about the above comment? Is that case 'don't care'?
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ