[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220712153836.41599-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:38:36 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: avoid invalid memory access via node_online(NUMA_NO_NODE)
KASAN reports:
[ 4.668325][ T0] BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in dmar_parse_one_rhsa (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:226 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/nodemask.h:415 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:497)
[ 4.676149][ T0] Read of size 8 at addr 1fffffff85115558 by task swapper/0/0
[ 4.683454][ T0]
[ 4.685638][ T0] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3-00004-g0e862838f290 #1
[ 4.694331][ T0] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5018D-FN4T/X10SDV-8C-TLN4F, BIOS 1.1 03/02/2016
[ 4.703196][ T0] Call Trace:
[ 4.706334][ T0] <TASK>
[ 4.709133][ T0] ? dmar_parse_one_rhsa (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:226 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/nodemask.h:415 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:497)
after converting the type of the first argument (@nr, bit number)
of arch_test_bit() from `long` to `unsigned long`[0].
Under certain conditions (for example, when ACPI NUMA is disabled
via command line), pxm_to_node() can return %NUMA_NO_NODE (-1).
It is valid 'magic' number of NUMA node, but not valid bit number
to use in bitops.
node_online() eventually descends to test_bit() without checking
for the input, assuming it's on caller side (which might be good
for perf-critical tasks). There, -1 becomes %ULONG_MAX which leads
to an insane array index when calculating bit position in memory.
For now, add an explicit check for @node being not %NUMA_NO_NODE
before calling test_bit(). The actual logics didn't change here
at all.
Fixes: ee34b32d8c29 ("dmar: support for parsing Remapping Hardware Static Affinity structure")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 9699ca101c62..64b14ac4c7b0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int dmar_parse_one_rhsa(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, void *arg)
if (drhd->reg_base_addr == rhsa->base_address) {
int node = pxm_to_node(rhsa->proximity_domain);
- if (!node_online(node))
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
drhd->iommu->node = node;
return 0;
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists