linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 08/11] net/9p: split message size argument into 't_size' and 'r

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:31:28 +0200
From:   Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
To:     v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Nikolay Kichukov <nikolay@...um.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] net/9p: split message size argument into 't_size'
 and 'r_size' pair

Refactor 'max_size' argument of p9_tag_alloc() and 'req_size' argument
of p9_client_prepare_req() both into a pair of arguments 't_size' and
'r_size' respectively to allow handling the buffer size for request and
reply separately from each other.

Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
---
 net/9p/client.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index fab939541c81..56be1658870d 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -255,24 +255,26 @@ static struct kmem_cache *p9_req_cache;
  * p9_tag_alloc - Allocate a new request.
  * @c: Client session.
  * @type: Transaction type.
- * @max_size: Maximum packet size for this request.
+ * @t_size: Buffer size for holding this request.
+ * @r_size: Buffer size for holding server's reply on this request.
  *
  * Context: Process context.
  * Return: Pointer to new request.
  */
 static struct p9_req_t *
-p9_tag_alloc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, unsigned int max_size)
+p9_tag_alloc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, uint t_size, uint r_size)
 {
 	struct p9_req_t *req = kmem_cache_alloc(p9_req_cache, GFP_NOFS);
-	int alloc_msize = min(c->msize, max_size);
+	int alloc_tsize = min(c->msize, t_size);
+	int alloc_rsize = min(c->msize, r_size);
 	int tag;
 
 	if (!req)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->tc, alloc_msize))
+	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->tc, alloc_tsize))
 		goto free_req;
-	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->rc, alloc_msize))
+	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->rc, alloc_rsize))
 		goto free;
 
 	p9pdu_reset(&req->tc);
@@ -678,7 +680,7 @@ static int p9_client_flush(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *oldreq)
 }
 
 static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_prepare_req(struct p9_client *c,
-					      int8_t type, int req_size,
+					      int8_t type, uint t_size, uint r_size,
 					      const char *fmt, va_list ap)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -694,7 +696,7 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_prepare_req(struct p9_client *c,
 	if (c->status == BeginDisconnect && type != P9_TCLUNK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
 
-	req = p9_tag_alloc(c, type, req_size);
+	req = p9_tag_alloc(c, type, t_size, r_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(req))
 		return req;
 
@@ -731,7 +733,7 @@ p9_client_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, const char *fmt, ...)
 	struct p9_req_t *req;
 
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	req = p9_client_prepare_req(c, type, c->msize, fmt, ap);
+	req = p9_client_prepare_req(c, type, c->msize, c->msize, fmt, ap);
 	va_end(ap);
 	if (IS_ERR(req))
 		return req;
@@ -829,7 +831,7 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
 	/* We allocate a inline protocol data of only 4k bytes.
 	 * The actual content is passed in zero-copy fashion.
 	 */
-	req = p9_client_prepare_req(c, type, P9_ZC_HDR_SZ, fmt, ap);
+	req = p9_client_prepare_req(c, type, P9_ZC_HDR_SZ, P9_ZC_HDR_SZ, fmt, ap);
 	va_end(ap);
 	if (IS_ERR(req))
 		return req;
-- 
2.30.2