[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220712182914.GK1723@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:29:14 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug
[Re: [PATCH v3] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug] On 10/07/2022 (Sun 09:01) Hillf Danton wrote:
> Looks like a ABBA deadlock that should be fed to lockdep, given what was
> blocking flusher (pid 213).
[,,,]
> Make lock_buffer have mutex_lock() semantics in attempt to catch the
> deadlock above.
>
> Only for thoughts now.
Thanks for the test patch - I'm keeping it as a reference for future
use.
So, preempt-rt issues an early lockdep splat at partition probe bootup,
both with and without the original v3 patch from this thread.
Of course then I figured I'd try the debug patch on vanilla v5.19-rc3
and we get pretty much the same lockdep complaint.
sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Preferred minimum I/O size 512 bytes
scsi 2:0:0:0: CD-ROM HL-DT-ST DVD-ROM DH30N A101 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
=====================================
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
5.19.0-rc3-dirty #2 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
swapper/2/0 is trying to release lock (buffer_head_lock) at:
[<ffffffffbc494a6b>] end_buffer_async_read+0x5b/0x180
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/2/0:
#0: ffff8bee27744080 (&ret->b_uptodate_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: end_buffer_async_read+0x47/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3-dirty #2
Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision WorkStation T5500 /0D883F, BIOS A16 05/28/2013
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x5c
lock_release+0x245/0x3f0
unlock_buffer+0x15/0x30
end_buffer_async_read+0x5b/0x180
end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x1e/0x40
blk_update_request+0x9a/0x470
scsi_end_request+0x27/0x190
scsi_io_completion+0x3c/0x580
blk_complete_reqs+0x39/0x50
__do_softirq+0x11d/0x344
irq_exit_rcu+0xa9/0xc0
common_interrupt+0xa5/0xc0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_common_interrupt+0x27/0x40
RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0x12d/0x3f0
Code: 49 43 0f 84 b7 02 00 00 31 ff e8 fe 1c 74 ff 45 84 ff 74 12 9c 58 f6 c4 02 0f 85 8e 02 00 00 31 ff e8 97 95 7a ff fb 45 85 f6 <0f> 88 12 01 00 00 49 63 d6 4c 2b 24 24 48 8d 04 52 48 8d 04 82 49
RSP: 0000:ffffa2890013fe90 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: 0000000080000002 RSI: ffffffffbd78d911 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff8bee2739a400 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000001faf40
R10: ffffa2890013fdc8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000a7b149d6
R13: ffffffffbdbee3a0 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000001
cpuidle_enter+0x24/0x40
do_idle+0x1e3/0x230
cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
start_secondary+0xe8/0xf0
secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xe0/0xeb
</TASK>
sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
sdb: sdb1 sdb2
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Not quite sure what to make of that.
Paul.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists