[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH7PR21MB3263AA690CF2D713ACD7CC9ACE869@PH7PR21MB3263.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:54:47 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>
CC: "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 07/12] net: mana: Export Work Queue functions for use
by RDMA driver
> Subject: RE: [Patch v4 07/12] net: mana: Export Work Queue functions for use
> by RDMA driver
>
> > From: longli@...uxonhyperv.com <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 7:07 PM @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int
> > mana_gd_send_request(struct gdma_context *gc,
> > u32 req_len, const void *req,
> >
> > return mana_hwc_send_request(hwc, req_len, req, resp_len, resp); }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mana_gd_send_request);
> Can we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
>
> > @@ -715,9 +715,10 @@ static int mana_create_wq_obj(struct
> > mana_port_context *apc,
> > out:
> > return err;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mana_create_wq_obj);
>
Will fix this in v5.
> Well, here we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. If there is a rule to decide which one
> should be used, please add a comment.
>
> In general, the patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists