linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document Renesas RZ/Five SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878roy16iw.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:21:27 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document Renesas RZ/Five SoC

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:19:16 +0100,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:51:33AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> > Can you please have a look at the latest instance[1][2] of this
> > series, as posted by Samuel? I've provisionally queued it, but only on
> > the provision that you would eventually ack these patches.
> 
> I did already[1]. They passed checks, were already in linux-next, and I 
> didn't see anything major needing comments, so I marked it N/A (meaning 
> someone else applies it) without comment.
> 
> Rob
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20220630100241.35233-2-samuel@sholland.org/

How are people supposed to track this if it doesn't appear on the ML?
That's not really an ack, AFAICT. That's a "I don't care".

Does it mean I'm free to take any random DT patch unless you or a bot
shouts? I'd rather know.

	M. (puzzled)

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.