| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:07:15 -0500
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] amd-pstate doesn't work since v5.18.11
On 7/12/2022 12:54, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On úterý 12. července 2022 19:50:33 CEST Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>> [Public]
>>
>> + Ray
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 12:50
>>> To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>; Limonciello, Mario
>>> <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Sasha Levin
>>> <sashal@...nel.org>; x86@...nel.org; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>;
>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Subject: RE: [REGRESSION] amd-pstate doesn't work since v5.18.11
>>>
>>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>>
>>> Hi Oleksandr:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 1:40 AM
>>>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; linux-
>>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>; Rafael J. Wysocki
>>>> <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>;
>>>> x86@...nel.org; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>> Subject: [REGRESSION] amd-pstate doesn't work since v5.18.11
>>>>
>>>> [CAUTION: External Email]
>>>>
>>>> Hello Mario.
>>>>
>>>> The following commits were pulled into v5.18.11:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> $ git log --oneline --no-merges v5.18.10..v5.18.11 | grep ACPI
>>>> 2783414e6ef7 ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is
>>>> supported
>>>> 3068cfeca3b5 ACPI: CPPC: Only probe for _CPC if CPPC v2 is acked
>>>> 8beb71759cc8 ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is
>>>> supported
>>>> 13bb696dd2f3 ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address space ```
>>>>
>>>> and now this happens:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> $ sudo modprobe amd-pstate shared_mem=1
>>>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'amd_pstate': No such device ```
>>>>
>>>> With v5.18.10 this worked just fine.
>>>>
>>>> In your upstream commit 8b356e536e69f3a4d6778ae9f0858a1beadabb1f
>>>> you write:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> If there is additional breakage on the shared memory designs also missing
>>>> this _OSC, additional follow up changes may be needed.
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> So the question is what else should be pulled into the stable tree to
>>>> unbreak amd-pstate?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could you share the lscpu output ?
>
> Here's my `lscpu`:
>
> ```
> Architecture: x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
> Address sizes: 43 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 24
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-23
> Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
> Model name: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core Processor
> CPU family: 23
> Model: 113
> Thread(s) per core: 2
> Core(s) per socket: 12
> Socket(s): 1
> Stepping: 0
> Frequency boost: enabled
> CPU(s) scaling MHz: 59%
> CPU max MHz: 3800,0000
> CPU min MHz: 2200,0000
> BogoMIPS: 7589.71
> Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf rapl pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt tce topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb bpext perfctr_llc mwaitx cpb cat_l3 cdp_l3 hw_pstate ssbd mba ibpb stibp vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 cqm rdt_a rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves cqm_llc cqm_occup_llc cqm_mbm_total cqm_mbm_local clzero irperf xsaveerptr rdpru wbnoinvd arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold avic v_vmsave_vmload vgif v_spec_ctrl umip rdpid overflow_recov succor smca sev sev_es
> Virtualization: AMD-V
> L1d cache: 384 KiB (12 instances)
> L1i cache: 384 KiB (12 instances)
> L2 cache: 6 MiB (12 instances)
> L3 cache: 64 MiB (4 instances)
> NUMA node(s): 1
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-23
> Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
> Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
> Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
> Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
> Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected
> Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
> Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
> Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines, IBPB conditional, STIBP conditional, RSB filling
> Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
> Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
>
> ```
>
>>> Perry.
>>
>> Thanks this is the sort of thing I was worried might happen as a result of requiring
>> the _OSC. It was introduced as part of that commit 8beb71759cc8.
>>
>> To solve it I think we need to add more things to cpc_supported_by_cpu
>> (https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux%2Fblob%2F525496a030de4ae64bb9e1d6bfc88eec6f5fe6e2%2Farch%2Fx86%2Fkernel%2Facpi%2Fcppc.c%23L19&data=05%7C01%7CMario.Limonciello%40amd.com%7C96addaab0edc4e22779908da642f84ac%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637932453099304670%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4KHD3UUlfDJEmpTpqDCmuV1x%2F7nj%2F0iuhwdnhJqtQeU%3D&reserved=0)
>>
>> The question is how do we safely detect the shared memory designs?
>> These are a fixed quantity as newer designs /should/ be using the MSR.
>>
>> I am tending to thing that unfortunately we need to have an allow-list of shared
>> memory design here unless someone has other ideas.
>
> Happy to test any patches as needed.
>
See if this helps out:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
index 734b96454896..88a81e6b9228 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
@@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ bool cpc_supported_by_cpu(void)
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19 &&
+ ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x00 &&
boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x0f) ||
+ (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x20 &&
boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x2f)))
+ return true;
+ else if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x17 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x70 &&
boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x7f)
+ return true;
return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPPC);
}
return false;
If that works and no one has a better idea how to do it for these
systems I'll send out a proper proper patch tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists