| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:58:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rushikesh S Kadam <rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Neeraj upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, vineeth@...byteword.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] rcuscale: Add test for using call_rcu_lazy() to
emulate kfree_rcu()
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 04:27:05PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Ah, with all the threads, I missed this one :(. Sorry about that.
I know that feeling...
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 7:06 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > Currently I added a test like the following which adds a new torture type, my
> > > thought was to stress the new code to make sure nothing crashed or hung the
> > > kernel. That is working well except I don't exactly understand the total-gps
> > > print showing 0, which the other print shows 1188 GPs. I'll go dig into that
> > > tomorrow.. thanks!
> > >
> > > The print shows
> > > TREE11 ------- 1474 GPs (12.2833/s) [rcu_lazy: g0 f0x0 total-gps=0]
> > > TREE11 no success message, 7 successful version messages
> >
> > Nice!!! It is very good to see you correctly using the rcu_torture_ops
> > facility correctly!
> >
> > And this could be good for your own testing, and I am happy to pull it
> > in for that purpose (given it being fixed, having a good commit log,
> > and so on). After all, TREE10 is quite similar -- not part of CFLIST,
> > but useful for certain types of focused testing.
> >
> > However, it would be very good to get call_rcu_lazy() testing going
> > more generally, and in particular in TREE01 where offloading changes
> > dynamically. A good way to do this is to add a .call_lazy() component
> > to the rcu_torture_ops structure, and check for it in a manner similar
> > to that done for the .deferred_free() component. Including adding a
> > gp_normal_lazy module parameter. This would allow habitual testing
> > on a few scenarios and focused lazy testing on all of them via the
> > --bootargs parameter.
>
> Ok, if you don't mind I will make this particular enhancement to the
> torture test in a future patchset, since I kind of decided on doing v3
> with just fixes to what I have and more testing. Certainly happy to
> enhance these tests in a future version.
No need to gate v3 on those tests.
> > On the total-gps=0, the usual suspicion would be that the lazy callbacks
> > never got invoked. It looks like you were doing about a two-minute run,
> > so maybe a longer run? Though weren't they supposed to kick in at 15
> > seconds or so? Or did this value of zero come about because this run
> > used exactly 300 grace periods?
>
> It was zero because it required the RCU_FLAVOR torture type, where as
> my torture type was lazy. Adding RCU_LAZY_FLAVOR to the list fixed it
> :)
Heh! Then it didn't actually do any testing. Done that as well!
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks!
>
> - Joel
>
>
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > > index 7120165a9342..cc6b7392d801 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > > @@ -872,6 +872,64 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops tasks_rude_ops = {
> > >
> > > #endif // #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Definitions for lazy RCU torture testing.
> > > + */
> > > +unsigned long orig_jiffies_till_flush;
> > > +
> > > +static void rcu_sync_torture_init_lazy(void)
> > > +{
> > > + rcu_sync_torture_init();
> > > +
> > > + orig_jiffies_till_flush = rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush();
> > > + rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(50);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void rcu_lazy_cleanup(void)
> > > +{
> > > + rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(orig_jiffies_till_flush);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_lazy_ops = {
> > > + .ttype = RCU_LAZY_FLAVOR,
> > > + .init = rcu_sync_torture_init_lazy,
> > > + .cleanup = rcu_lazy_cleanup,
> > > + .readlock = rcu_torture_read_lock,
> > > + .read_delay = rcu_read_delay,
> > > + .readunlock = rcu_torture_read_unlock,
> > > + .readlock_held = torture_readlock_not_held,
> > > + .get_gp_seq = rcu_get_gp_seq,
> > > + .gp_diff = rcu_seq_diff,
> > > + .deferred_free = rcu_torture_deferred_free,
> > > + .sync = synchronize_rcu,
> > > + .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_expedited,
> > > + .get_gp_state = get_state_synchronize_rcu,
> > > + .start_gp_poll = start_poll_synchronize_rcu,
> > > + .poll_gp_state = poll_state_synchronize_rcu,
> > > + .cond_sync = cond_synchronize_rcu,
> > > + .call = call_rcu_lazy,
> > > + .cb_barrier = rcu_barrier,
> > > + .fqs = rcu_force_quiescent_state,
> > > + .stats = NULL,
> > > + .gp_kthread_dbg = show_rcu_gp_kthreads,
> > > + .check_boost_failed = rcu_check_boost_fail,
> > > + .stall_dur = rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check,
> > > + .irq_capable = 1,
> > > + .can_boost = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST),
> > > + .extendables = RCUTORTURE_MAX_EXTEND,
> > > + .name = "rcu_lazy"
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define LAZY_OPS &rcu_lazy_ops,
> > > +
> > > +#else // #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> > > +
> > > +#define LAZY_OPS
> > > +
> > > +#endif // #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> > > +
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > >
> > > @@ -3145,7 +3203,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
> > > unsigned long gp_seq = 0;
> > > static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
> > > &rcu_ops, &rcu_busted_ops, &srcu_ops, &srcud_ops, &busted_srcud_ops,
> > > - TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS TASKS_TRACING_OPS
> > > + TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS TASKS_TRACING_OPS LAZY_OPS
> > > &trivial_ops,
> > > };
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..436013f3e015
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > > +CONFIG_SMP=y
> > > +CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n
> > > +CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n
> > > +CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
> > > +#CHECK#CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> > > +CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC=n
> > > +CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y
> > > +CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n
> > > +CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y
> > > +CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
> > > +CONFIG_MAXSMP=y
> > > +CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
> > > +CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
> > > +CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
> > > +CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
> > > +CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11.boot
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..9b6f720d4ccd
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE11.boot
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > > +maxcpus=8 nr_cpus=43
> > > +rcutree.gp_preinit_delay=3
> > > +rcutree.gp_init_delay=3
> > > +rcutree.gp_cleanup_delay=3
> > > +rcu_nocbs=0-7
> > > +rcutorture.torture_type=rcu_lazy
> > > +rcutorture.nocbs_nthreads=8
> > > +rcutorture.fwd_progress=0
> > > --
> > > 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists