[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys3+UTTC4Qgbm7pQ@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 23:05:53 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, Huang@...gle.com,
Shaoqin <shaoqin.huang@...el.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm: add NR_SECONDARY_PAGETABLE to count secondary
page table uses.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks for taking another look at this!
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 1:59 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > index aab70355d64f3..13190d298c986 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ enum node_stat_item {
> > > NR_KERNEL_SCS_KB, /* measured in KiB */
> > > #endif
> > > NR_PAGETABLE, /* used for pagetables */
> > > + NR_SECONDARY_PAGETABLE, /* secondary pagetables, e.g. kvm shadow pagetables */
> >
> > Nit, s/kvm/KVM, and drop the "shadow", which might be misinterpreted as saying KVM
> > pagetables are only accounted when KVM is using shadow paging. KVM's usage of "shadow"
> > is messy, so I totally understand why you included it, but in this case it's unnecessary
> > and potentially confusing.
> >
> > And finally, something that's not a nit. Should this be wrapped with CONFIG_KVM
> > (using IS_ENABLED() because KVM can be built as a module)? That could be removed
> > if another non-KVM secondary MMU user comes along, but until then, #ifdeffery for
> > stats the depend on a single feature seems to be the status quo for this code.
> >
>
> I will #ifdef the stat, but I will emphasize in the docs that is
> currently *only* used for KVM so that it makes sense if users without
> KVM don't see the stat at all. I will also remove the stat from
> show_free_areas() in mm/page_alloc.c as it seems like none of the
> #ifdefed stats show up there.
It's might be worth getting someone from mm/ to weigh in before going through the
trouble, my suggestion/question is based purely on the existing code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists