linux-kernel - RE: [Patch v4 12/12] RDMA/mana_ib: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <PH7PR21MB32632A5DCB5EF60A4D599FC2CE869@PH7PR21MB3263.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 23:46:36 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
        Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 12/12] RDMA/mana_ib: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure
 Network Adapter

> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 12/12] RDMA/mana_ib: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure
> Network Adapter
> 
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 07:07:20PM -0700, longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/cq.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR Linux-OpenIB
> 
> Why perpetuate this mess that the OpenIB people created?  I thought that no
> new drivers were going to be added with this, why does this one need to have it
> as well if it is new?

I apologize for the incorrect license language. I followed other RDMA driver's license terms but didn't' realized their licensing language is not up to the standard.

The newly introduced EFA RDMA driver used the following license terms:
(drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_main.c)
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause

Is it acceptable that we use the same license terms?

Thanks,
Long