[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220712082036.5130-3-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:20:33 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: default to false in test_idle_cores
It's uncertain whether idle cores exist or not if shared sched-
domains are not ready, so returning "no idle cores" usually
makes sense.
While __update_idle_core() is an exception, it checks status
of this core and set to shared sched-domain if necessary. So
the whole logic depends on the existence of sds, and can bail
out early if !sds.
It's somehow a little tricky, and as Josh suggested that it
should be transient while the domain isn't ready. So remove
the self-defined default value to make things more clearer,
while introduce little overhead in idle path.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index cd758b3616bd..c72093f282ec 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1592,11 +1592,11 @@ numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
/* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
+static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu);
static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
{
if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present) ||
- idle_core >= 0 || !test_idle_cores(cpu, false))
+ idle_core >= 0 || !test_idle_cores(cpu))
return idle_core;
/*
@@ -6260,7 +6260,7 @@ static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
WRITE_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores, val);
}
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
+static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu)
{
struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
@@ -6268,7 +6268,7 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
if (sds)
return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
- return def;
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -6284,7 +6284,7 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
int cpu;
rcu_read_lock();
- if (test_idle_cores(core, true))
+ if (test_idle_cores(core))
goto unlock;
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
@@ -6360,9 +6360,9 @@ static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
{
}
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
+static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu)
{
- return def;
+ return false;
}
static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
@@ -6604,7 +6604,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
return target;
if (sched_smt_active()) {
- has_idle_core = test_idle_cores(target, false);
+ has_idle_core = test_idle_cores(target);
if (!has_idle_core && cpus_share_cache(prev, target)) {
i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, prev);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists