linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: fix the chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:13:14 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: fix the chip_name configfs item

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:40 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:34:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

...

> Not totally convinced by Andy's suggestion to rename swnode to fwnode.
> Variables should be named for what they represent, not their type, and
> you use swnode extensively elsewhere in the module, so either change it
> everywhere or not at all, and such a sweeping change is beyond the scope
> this patch.

Ah, I agree that consistency has higher priority here.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko