[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcv3zVGjty_vLUgYu3sowNtg-sWg=qtVt7Vp6mqX6pLvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:11:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] pinctrl: sunxi: add support for R329 CPUX pin controller
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:37 AM Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me> wrote:
> > 在 2022-07-10星期日的 21:06 +0200,Andy Shevchenko写道:
> > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:22 AM Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > >
> > > No use of these.
> > >
> > > > +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> > >
> > > Missed headers:
> > > mod_devicetable.h
> >
> > Thanks for these.
> >
> > In addition, how to decide what header should be included? The code
> > works properly because of_device.h includes mod_devicetable.h.
Forgot to put in the first place this:
The rule of thumb is Include headers that the header or C module is
direct user of. Additional information is located in the sections
below.
> The best approach is usually learnt with experience — the more you
> code, the more you get. One of the rules is to avoid too many
> inclusions and at the same time reduce indirect inclusions, so that
> the headers which are guaranteed to be included by others shouldn't
> appear. Another rule is that, for the headers (*.h files) the forward
> declarations are preferable over the inclusion in case if the opaque
> pointers are in use.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists