linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] kexec, panic: Making crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xhsmh35f68tz4.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:13:03 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>,
        "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] kexec, panic: Making crash_kexec() NMI safe

On 12/07/22 10:47, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/30/22 at 11:32pm, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Here's ~v3~ v4 where we now completely get rid of kexec_mutex.
>>
>> o Patch 1 makes sure all kexec_mutex acquisitions are trylocks. This prevents
>>   having to add any while(atomic_cmpxchg()) loops which I'd really hate to see
>>   here. If that can't be done then I think we're better off with the combined
>>   mutex+atomic var approach.
>> o Patch 2 does the mutex -> atomic var switch.
>
> This series looks good, has it been taken into any tree?
>

I don't think so, briefly poked around git and haven't seen it anywhere.

> Thanks
> Baoquan