[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zghf5eov.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:59:12 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 1/7] migrate: fix syscall move_pages() return value
for failure
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 04:49:42PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> return store_status(status, start, node, i - start);
>> @@ -1768,8 +1768,12 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
>>
>> err = move_pages_and_store_status(mm, current_node, &pagelist,
>> status, start, i, nr_pages);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> + /* We have stored status of page i */
>
> IMHO, "We have accounted for page i" gives a more clear statement.
Sure. Will change this.
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
>> + if (err > 0)
>> + err--;
>> goto out;
>> + }
>> current_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> }
>> out_flush:
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists