[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220712122541.GA21746@workstation>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:55:41 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] OPP: Add support for multiple clocks*
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:22:40PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-07-22, 18:40, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > This break OPP parsing on SC8280XP and hence cpufreq and other things:
> >
> > [ +0.010890] cpu cpu0: _opp_add_static_v2: opp key field not found
> > [ +0.000019] cpu cpu0: _of_add_opp_table_v2: Failed to add OPP, -19
> > [ +0.000060] cpu cpu0: _opp_is_duplicate: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: 300000000, volt: 576000, enabled: 1. New: freq: 403200000, volt: 576000, enabled: 1
> > [ +0.000030] cpu cpu0: _opp_is_duplicate: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: 300000000, volt: 576000, enabled: 1. New: freq: 499200000, volt: 576000, enabled: 1
> > ...
> >
> > I just did a rebase on next-20220708 and hit this.
> >
> > I've narrowed it down to _read_rate() now returning -ENODEV since
> > opp_table->clk_count is zero.
> >
> > Similar to what was reported for tegra for v1:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/58cc8e3c-74d4-e432-8502-299312a1f15e@collabora.com/
> >
> > I don't have time to look at this any more today, but it would we nice
> > if you could unbreak linux-next.
> >
> > Perhaps Bjorn or Mani can help with further details, but this doesn't
> > look like something that is specific to SC8280XP.
>
> It is actually. This is yet another corner case, Tegra had one as
> well.
>
> I have tried to understand the Qcom code / setup to best of my
> abilities, and the problem as per me is that qcom-cpufreq-hw doesn't
> provide a clk to the OPP core, which breaks it after the new updates
> to the OPP core. I believe following will solve it. Can someone please
> try this ? I will then merge it with the right commit.
>
I gave it a shot on Lenovo X13s based on SC8280 SoC and it fixes the OPP
issue. So you can add,
Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Mani
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index 666e1ebf91d1..4f4a285886fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -1384,6 +1384,20 @@ static struct opp_table *_update_opp_table_clk(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> + /*
> + * There are few platforms which don't want the OPP core to
> + * manage device's clock settings. In such cases neither the
> + * platform provides the clks explicitly to us, nor the DT
> + * contains a valid clk entry. The OPP nodes in DT may still
> + * contain "opp-hz" property though, which we need to parse and
> + * allow the platform to find an OPP based on freq later on.
> + *
> + * This is a simple solution to take care of such corner cases,
> + * i.e. make the clk_count 1, which lets us allocate space for
> + * frequency in opp->rates and also parse the entries in DT.
> + */
> + opp_table->clk_count = 1;
> +
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> return opp_table;
> }
>
> --
> viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists