[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220712095325.408d1730@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:53:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhaohui.shi@...izon.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/rt: fix bad task migration for rt tasks
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:31:24 +0800
Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -1998,11 +1998,15 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
> * the mean time, task could have
> * migrated already or had its affinity changed.
> * Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq.
> + * It is possible the task was scheduled, set
> + * "migrate_disabled" and then got preempted, And we
> + * check task migration disable flag here too.
Nit. "got preempted, so we must check the task migration disable flag here
too".
But other than that.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
> */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists