lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys7c0JGAV7AAEjaO@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:55:12 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix PMU interrupt

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 08:04:29PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> PPI interrupt should be 7 for the PMU.
> 
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Reported-by: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 268ab423577a..2d7823cb783c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ memory@...00000 {
>  
>  	pmu {
>  		compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> -		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  	};
>  
>  	psci {

The interrupt number matches the vendor devicetree I have access to, but
the vendor source also has IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW instead of
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH here.

Is that another copy-paste error, perhaps?

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ