linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module: kunit: Load .kunit_test_suites section when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGS_qxrNKnrWXhOfptz9iL5c_sixhKjpAfR2RLQi1XqL6m2Tpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:24:32 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: kunit: Load .kunit_test_suites section when CONFIG_KUNIT=m

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:52 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The new KUnit module handling has KUnit test suites listed in a
> .kunit_test_suites section of each module. This should be loaded when
> the module is, but at the moment this only happens if KUnit is built-in.
>
> Also load this when KUnit is enabled as a module: it'll not be usable
> unless KUnit is loaded, but such modules are likely to depend on KUnit
> anyway, so it's unlikely to ever be loaded needlessly.

This seems reasonable to me.

Question: what happens in this case?
1. insmod <test-module>
2. insmod kunit
3. rmmod <test-module>

I think on 3, we'll call the cleanup code, __kunit_test_suites_exit(),
for <test-module>, I think?
But we never called __kunit_test_suites_init().
My fear is what breaks as a result of this precondition break.

E.g. In the case that CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled, this includes a
call to kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite() with no previous call to
kunit_debugfs_create_suite().
That will include a call to debugfs_remove_recursive(suite->debugfs),
where suite->debugfs is an uninitialized pointer.

Maybe we can treat it as "undefined behavior" for now and proceed with
this patch.

In terms of long-term fixes, perhaps insmod kunit could trigger it to
1. run all built-in tests (IIUC, it doesn't right now)
2. run all the tests of currently loaded modules
3. track which modules already ran so if you rmmod + insmod kunit
again, it won't rerun tests?

Daniel