[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c60f5634e8605cb4c2ef4646b6e511e6135bea48.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:11:22 -0700
From: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: PNP0501 serial driver takes almost 2 seconds to suspend/resume
(printk issue)
I've updated the bugzilla entry with new data:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216216
I just added 3 new tests for 5.19.0-rc6 on 3 machines that see this
issue: otcpl-asus-e200-cht (cherry trail), otcpl-aml-y (amber lake),
and otcpl-whl-u (whiskey lake). The kernel has the CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER
option enabled.
The test is a S2idle and is run thusly:
%> sleepgraph -dev -m freeze -rtcwake 15
I've included the dmesg boot logs for all three. The dmesg
suspend/resume logs are included in the html timelines by clicking the
"dmesg" button in the upper right hand corner of the timeline. There's
a "log" button as well that shows other system into.
These files are attached to the bugzilla entry.
otcpl-aml-y-5.19.0-rc6-boot-dmesg.txt
otcpl-aml-y-5.19.0-rc6-freeze.html
otcpl-asus-e200-cht-5.19.0-rc6-boot-dmesg.txt
otcpl-asus-e200-cht-5.19.0-rc6-freeze.html
otcpl-whl-u-5.19.0-rc6-boot-dmesg.txt
otcpl-whl-u-5.19.0-rc6-freeze.html
If possible can we move this thread to the bugzilla comment section?
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 11:57 +0206, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2022-07-11, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > It seems that __pr_flush() does not check whether all consoles
> > > are
> > > suspended. In this case the progress is not possible and it has
> > > to
> > > wait the entire timeout.
> >
> > But isn't console_suspended set after pr_flush() call?
>
> There should not be any printing after the suspend_console() message.
> If
> Todd's report is coming from 5.19-rc1, then it is likely a kthread
> issue, where the kthread is not respecting @console_suspended. (This
> would still need to be fixed for the kthreads, but would not be
> relevant
> for 5.19.)
>
> John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists