[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a508ce3c711ebac73695af98a5d17187e22e74cb.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:18:42 +0200
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com
Cc: bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cmetcalf@...hip.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bsegall@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz/full, sched/rt: Fix missed tick-reenabling bug in
dequeue_task_rt
On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 11:22 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> dequeue_task_rt() only decrements 'rt_rq->rt_nr_running' after having
> called sched_update_tick_dependency() preventing it from re-enabling the
> tick on systems that no longer have pending SCHED_RT tasks but have
> multiple runnable SCHED_OTHER tasks:
>
> dequeue_task_rt()
> dequeue_rt_entity()
> dequeue_rt_stack()
> dequeue_top_rt_rq()
> sub_nr_running() // decrements rq->nr_running
> sched_update_tick_dependency()
> sched_can_stop_tick() // checks rq->rt.rt_nr_running,
> ...
> __dequeue_rt_entity()
> dec_rt_tasks() // decrements rq->rt.rt_nr_running
> ...
>
> Every other scheduler class performs the operation in the opposite
> order, and sched_update_tick_dependency() expects the values to be
> updated as such. So avoid the misbehaviour by inverting the order in
> which the above operations are performed in the RT scheduler.
>
> Fixes: 76d92ac305f2 ("sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency mask model")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
> ---
Ping :)
--
Nicolás Sáenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists