[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0isKcnm-xEHok1UeAdFJtRzi62SKXEUmNCVM+bdtsWRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 20:33:09 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] ACPI / x86: Use new `pm_suspend_preferred_s2idle`
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 4:33 AM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> Drop the direct check from the FADT and use the helper instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> index 2963229062f8..b1483d5092c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
> if (lps0_device_handle)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0))
> + if (!pm_suspend_preferred_s2idle())
This needs to be checked in a different place in this function.
Let me cut a patch for that.
> return 0;
>
> if (acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd()) {
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists