[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgUGp96_Wup3=Utws=Mn+07vi7ZXknv4nKZkAJv8Ezhnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:45:14 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524025139.40212-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> >
> > That patch looks sane to me, but I guess Guenter would need to check
>
> I still see the failure in my builds with this patch. But surprisingly
> I dont see the build failure (with or without this patch) with gcc-12,
> only with gcc-11.
Arrghs. "build failure"?
So is there another problem than the runtime issue that Guenter reports:
OF: amba_device_add() failed (-19) for /amba/smc@...00000
in this area? That patch looks harmless from a build standpoint, but
that's not saying much, so can you please quote the actual build
failure here?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists