linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] xfs: fix for variable set but not used warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:51:09 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To:     sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
Cc:     hch@....de, dchinner@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kelulanainsley@...il.com,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] xfs: fix for variable set but not used warning

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:43:00AM +0800, sunliming wrote:
> Fix below kernel warning:
> 
> fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c:539:19: warning: variable 'agno' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> index a02ec8fbc8ac..032de115e373 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> @@ -533,14 +533,12 @@ xrep_reap_block(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_btree_cur		*cur;
>  	struct xfs_buf			*agf_bp = NULL;
> -	xfs_agnumber_t			agno;
>  	xfs_agblock_t			agbno;
>  	bool				has_other_rmap;
>  	int				error;
>  
> -	agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, fsbno);
>  	agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(sc->mp, fsbno);
> -	ASSERT(agno == sc->sa.pag->pag_agno);
> +	ASSERT(XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, fsbno) == sc->sa.pag->pag_agno);

Much better, thank you.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>

--D

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are repairing per-inode metadata, we need to read in the AGF
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>