linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2a3fc9c-82e7-939c-b183-6dd57ccf9444@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:09:49 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

On 7/13/22 08:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I didn't know if the new includes needed to be prefixed with "../"
> as well ... I though it was better safe than sorry.

If it compiles, it's perfect. :)

Thanks, I'll check it out and report to Linus the reason for the conflict.

Paolo

> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.