[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ba15d8532b726bd1a16cf2956140b2cba5d74f7.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:22:15 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <deller@....de>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: <msp@...libre.com>, <granquet@...libre.com>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<liangxu.xu@...iatek.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort
driver
Hi, Bo-Chen:
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 19:12 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>
> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195
> SoC.
>
> It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
>
> The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will
> never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> that
> both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> device
> data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> used
> to control the phy properties.
>
> This driver is based on an initial version by
> Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static int mtk_dp_bridge_atomic_check(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_bridge_state
> *bridge_state,
> + struct drm_crtc_state
> *crtc_state,
> + struct drm_connector_state
> *conn_state)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp = mtk_dp_from_bridge(bridge);
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = conn_state->crtc;
> + unsigned int input_bus_format;
> +
> + input_bus_format = bridge_state->input_bus_cfg.format;
> +
> + dev_dbg(mtk_dp->dev, "input format 0x%04x, output format
> 0x%04x\n",
> + bridge_state->input_bus_cfg.format,
> + bridge_state->output_bus_cfg.format);
> +
> + if (input_bus_format == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_1X16)
> + mtk_dp->info.format = DP_PIXELFORMAT_YUV422;
> + else
> + mtk_dp->info.format = DP_PIXELFORMAT_RGB;
> +
> + if (!crtc) {
> + drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev,
> + "Can't enable bridge as connector state doesn't
> have a crtc\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mtk_dp_parse_drm_mode_timings(mtk_dp, &crtc_state-
> >adjusted_mode);
> + if (mtk_dp_parse_capabilities(mtk_dp)) {
mtk_dp_bridge_atomic_enable() would call mtk_dp_parse_capabilities(),
so this is redundant.
Regards,
CK
> + drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev,
> + "Can't enable bridge as nothing is plugged
> in\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists