linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/130] 5.10.131-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsBFy65-Y1Yo_Zr_bJWGV6QYhMaEhyaShOG+qoOD7pu+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:05:26 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/130] 5.10.131-rc1 review

On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 04:45, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/12/22 11:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.131 release.
> > There are 130 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:32:19 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.131-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h


> perf fails to build with:

I have also noticed perf build failed.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

In file included from util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-insn-decoder.c:15:
util/intel-pt-decoder/../../../arch/x86/lib/insn.c:13:10: fatal error:
asm/inat.h: No such file or directory
   13 | #include <asm/inat.h> /* __ignore_sync_check__ */
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

Build log:
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2BrKWlDZbrZwQIfxzeMf6fv37sn/

>    CC
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-insn-decoder.o
> In file included from util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-insn-decoder.c:15:
> util/intel-pt-decoder/../../../arch/x86/lib/insn.c:13:10: fatal error:
> asm/inat.h: No such file or directory
>   #include <asm/inat.h> /* __ignore_sync_check__ */
>            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> make[7]: *** [util/intel-pt-decoder/Build:14:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-insn-decoder.o]
> Error 1
> make[6]: ***
> [/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:139:
> intel-pt-decoder] Error 2
> make[5]: ***
> [/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/build/Makefile.build:139:
> util] Error 2
> make[4]: *** [Makefile.perf:643:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/perf-in.o]
> Error 2
> make[3]: *** [Makefile.perf:229: sub-make] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [package/pkg-generic.mk:294:
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-tools/.stamp_built]
> Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:27: _all] Error 2
>
> you will need to pick this patch as well:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0705ef64d1ff52b817e278ca6e28095585ff31e1
>
> With that one applied:
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> --
> Florian

- Naresh