linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Use active mask for new worker when pool is DISASSOCIATED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0320c5f9-cbda-1652-1f97-24d1a22fb298@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:52:58 +0800
From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To:     Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>, tj@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhaohui.shi@...izon.ai,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Use active mask for new worker when pool is
 DISASSOCIATED



CC Peter.
Peter has changed the CPU binding code in workqueue.c.

I'm not understanding the problem enough, if kthread_bind_mask() is buggy
in workqueue.c, it would be buggy in other places too.


On 2022/7/7 17:05, Schspa Shi wrote:

>   
> -	if (worker->rescue_wq)
> -		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
> +	if (worker->rescue_wq) {
> +		if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
> +			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_active_mask);
> +		else
> +			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
> +	}
>   

For unbound pools (which also has POOL_DISASSOCIATED), pool->attrs->cpumask
should be used if pool->attrs->cpumask has active cpu.


> +
> +	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
> +	if ((pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) {
> +		/* We can't call get_online_cpus, there will be deadlock
> +		 * cpu_active_mask will no change, because we have
> +		 * wq_pool_attach_mutex hold.
> +		 **/
> +		kthread_bind_mask(worker->task, cpu_active_mask);
> +	} else {
> +		kthread_bind_mask(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);


For unbound pools, pool->attrs->cpumask should be used if pool->attrs->cpumask
has active cpu.

wq_pool_attach_mutex is held here and in worker_attach_to_pool() which smells bad.



The change is complex.  And if kthread_bind_mask() can't work as expected here,
the change I prefer would be:

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 4056f2a3f9d5..1ad8aef5fe98 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1862,6 +1862,12 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
  {
  	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);

+	/*
+	 * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any
+	 * online CPUs.  It'll be re-applied when any of the CPUs come up.
+	 */
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
+
  	/*
  	 * The wq_pool_attach_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED remains
  	 * stable across this function.  See the comments above the flag
@@ -1872,9 +1877,6 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
  	else
  		kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, pool->cpu);

-	if (worker->rescue_wq)
-		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
-
  	list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
  	worker->pool = pool;

@@ -1952,7 +1954,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
  		goto fail;

  	set_user_nice(worker->task, pool->attrs->nice);
-	kthread_bind_mask(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
+	worker->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;

  	/* successful, attach the worker to the pool */
  	worker_attach_to_pool(worker, pool);
@@ -4270,7 +4272,7 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  	}

  	wq->rescuer = rescuer;
-	kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, cpu_possible_mask);
+	rescuer->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
  	wake_up_process(rescuer->task);

  	return 0;


It is untested.  It effectively reverts the commit 640f17c82460e
("workqueue: Restrict affinity change to rescuer").
It avoids using kthread_bind_mask().