[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys7Cm17ShWUOXkRw@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:03:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/61] 5.18.12-rc1 review
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 04:33:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.12 release.
> > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:32:19 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.12-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on x86_64 (and still validating results)
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> 1) kernel panic on x86_64 while running kvm-unit-tests.
> - APIC base relocation is unsupported by KVM
Seems others are hitting this too:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAMGffEm9y0wnn8LNS9Qo3obPhs0GD5iJZ0WejFzC4baGPDsYTw@mail.gmail.com
Does this also happen right now on Linus's tree?
> 2) qemu_x86_64 boot warning
> - WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:558
> apply_returns+0x19c/0x1d0
Warning, but does everything still work?
And again, still on Linus's tree?
> 3) New warnings noticed while building perf
> - Warning: Kernel ABI header at
> 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h' differs from latest
> version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h'
Ick, I'll wait for that to get synced in Linus's tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists