[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cac3590-3e9c-bdf3-4211-8559e581d44d@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 06:20:35 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6
On 7/14/22 00:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:51 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:01 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
>>> If you want to apply Guenter's patch original patch:
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/490184/
>>> That's fine with me.
>>
>> Honestly, by this time I feel that it's too little, too late.
>
> [...]
>
>> So considering that the ppc people ignored this whole issue since the
>> merge window, I think it's entirely unreasonable to then apply a
>> ppc-specific patch for this at this time, when people literally asked
>> "why is this needed", and there was no reply from the powerpc side.
>
> Oh, it's not just this one. The lists of build regressions between v5.18
> and v5.19-rc1 [1] resp. v5.19-rc6 [2] look surprisingly similar :-(
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220606082201.2792145-1-geert@linux-m68k.org
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220711064425.3084093-1-geert@linux-m68k.org
>
How do you build your images ? I don't see many of the problems you report,
even if I build the files with W=1. It is odd, since reports such as
drivers/mfd/asic3.c:941:23: error: unused variable 'asic'
are real, but I just don't see that. If I build that file, I see that
it builds with -Wno-unused-but-set-variable, due to
Makefile:KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
The override in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn doesn't seem to work even though
it adds "-Wunused-but-set-variable" to the compile flags. And if I remove
"-Wno-unused-but-set-variable" from Makefile I still don't get the error/warning.
Confused. I must be missing something, but what ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists