lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:38:06 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Sony Xperia
 1 IV



On 14.07.2022 14:51, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/07/22 14:34, Konrad Dybcio ha scritto:
>> Add support for Sony Xperia 1 IV, a.k.a PDX223. This device is a part
>> of the SoMC SM8450 Nagara platform and currently it is the only
>> device based on that board, so no -common DTSI is created until (if?)
>> other Nagara devices appear.
>>
>> This commit brings support for:
>> * SD Card
>> * USB (*including SuperSpeed*)
>> * ADSP/CDSP/SLPI (modem remains untested for now)
>> * Most regulators (some GPIO-enabled ones require PMIC GPIOs but
>> trying to access any SPMI device crashes the device..)
>> * Part of I2C-connected peripherals (notably no touch due to a
>> driver bug)
>> * PCIe0 (PCIe1 is unused)
>>
>> Do note display via simplefb is not supported, as the display is blanked
>> upon exiting XBL.
>>
>> To create a working boot image, you need to run:
>> cat arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-\
>> nagara-pdx223.dtb > .Image.gz-dtb
>>
>> mkbootimg \
>> --kernel .Image.gz-dtb \
>> --ramdisk some_initrd.img \
>> --pagesize 4096 \
>> --base 0x0 \
>> --kernel_offset 0x8000 \
>> --ramdisk_offset 0x1000000 \
>> --tags_offset 0x100 \
>> --cmdline "SOME_CMDLINE" \
>> --dtb_offset 0x1f00000 \
>> --header_version 1 \
>> --os_version 12 \
>> --os_patch_level 2022-06 \ # or newer
>> -o boot.img-sony-xperia-pdx223
>>
>> Then, you need to flash it on the device and get rid of all the
>> vendor_boot/dtbo mess:
>>
>> // You have to either pull vbmeta{"","_system"} from
>> // /dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/ or build one as a part of AOSP build process
>> fastboot --disable-verity --disable-verification flash vbmeta vbmeta.img
>> fastboot --disable-verity --disable-verification flash vbmeta_system \
>> vbmeta_system.img
>>
>> fastboot flash boot boot.img-sony-xperia-pdx223
>> fastboot erase vendor_boot
>> fastboot erase recovery
>> fastboot flash dtbo emptydtbo.img
>> fastboot reboot
>>
>> Where emptydtbo.img is a tiny file that consists of 2 bytes (all zeroes), doing
>> a "fastboot erase" won't cut it, the bootloader will go crazy and things will
>> fall apart when it tries to overlay random bytes from an empty partition onto a
>> perfectly good appended DTB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - remove a stray blank line
>> - use generic node names for CS35L41
>> - fix up indentation for sdhci-caps-mask
>>
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
>>   .../qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dts | 634 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 635 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>> index 01773f3ce57f..157ef6958e1f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>> @@ -126,3 +126,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)    += sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx214.dtb
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)    += sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx215.dtb
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)    += sm8450-hdk.dtb
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)    += sm8450-qrd.dtb
>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)    += sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dtb
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..7fe582b92a61
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,634 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
>> +#include "sm8450.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/delete-node/ &adsp_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &rmtfs_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &video_mem;
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +    model = "Sony Xperia 1 IV";
>> +    compatible = "sony,pdx223", "qcom,sm8450";
>> +    chassis-type = "handset";
>> +
> 
> ..snip..
> 
>> +
>> +&gpi_dma0 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&gpi_dma1 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&gpi_dma2 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* I2C4 is used, it hosts a Samsung touchscreen, but GPI DMA is broken.. */
> 
> Why aren't you enabling i2c4 like you did with i2c 5/9/13?
> 
> If enabling that produces any side effect you should advertise that.
The comment explains it, no point in enabling it if not even the dma engine
behind it is functioning properly and you can't interact with the bus, waste
of power and cpu cycles.


> 
>> +
>> +&i2c5 {
>> +    clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +
>> +    /* Dialog SLG51000 CMIC @ 75 */
>> +};
>> +
>> +&i2c9 {
>> +    clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +
>> +    /* NXP SN1X0 NFC @ 28 */
>> +};
>> +
>> +&i2c13 {
>> +    clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +
>> +    /* Richwave RTC6226 FM Radio Receiver @ 64 */
>> +};
>> +
>> +&i2c14 {
>> +    clock-frequency = <1000000>;
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +
>> +    cs35l41_l: speaker-amp@40 {
> 
> What about an even more generic audio-amplifier@40 ?
That's really an arbitrary barrier to decide when it's "generic enough", I'll
leave that up to the maintainers to decide.


> 
>> +        compatible = "cirrus,cs35l41";
>> +        reg = <0x40>;
>> +        interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
>> +        interrupts = <182 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> +        reset-gpios = <&tlmm 183 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-peak-milliamp = <4000>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-ind-nanohenry = <1000>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-cap-microfarad = <15>;
>> +        cirrus,gpio2-src-select = <2>;
>> +        cirrus,gpio2-output-enable;
>> +        cirrus,asp-sdout-hiz = <3>;
>> +        #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    cs35l41_r: speaker-amp@41 {
>> +        compatible = "cirrus,cs35l41";
>> +        reg = <0x41>;
>> +        interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
>> +        interrupts = <182 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> +        reset-gpios = <&tlmm 183 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-peak-milliamp = <4000>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-ind-nanohenry = <1000>;
>> +        cirrus,boost-cap-microfarad = <15>;
>> +        cirrus,gpio2-src-select = <2>;
>> +        cirrus,gpio2-output-enable;
>> +        cirrus,asp-sdout-hiz = <3>;
>> +        #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>> +    };
>> +};
>> +
> 
> ..snip..
> 
>> +
>> +&sdhc_2 {
>> +    cd-gpios = <&tlmm 92 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&sdc2_default_state &sdc2_card_det_n>;
>> +    pinctrl-1 = <&sdc2_sleep_state &sdc2_card_det_n>;
>> +    vmmc-supply = <&pm8350c_l9>;
>> +    vqmmc-supply = <&pm8350c_l6>;
> 
>> +    /* Forbid SDR104/SDR50 - broken hw! */
>> +    sdhci-caps-mask = <0x3 0x0>;
> 
> Is this a device-specific quirk? Is Sony hardware broken, or is it a SoC
> (or SoC version-specific) issue?
> 
> If this is a SoC-specific issue, that should be rectified in sdhci-msm instead.
If it was a SoC-specific issue, it would land in the SoC-specific DTSI. This is the
PDX223-specific DTSI, so I think it's pretty clear..


Konrad
> 
>> +    no-sdio;
>> +    no-mmc;
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ