[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14b0e150-511c-867a-281a-1d13e7e318e8@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:13:12 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question: regmap_field_write() - why using update?
On 14/07/2022 17:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 05:01:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> I am converting my driver using MMIO to regmap from readl/writel and to
>> my surprise I found that regmap_field_write() does not behave the same
>> as regmap_write(). I would expect that they are the same, except one
>> operates on fields.
>
>> However regmap_field_write() uses an update method [1] which means it
>> reads and performs update. regmap_write() simply writes without a read.
>
>> I find it inconsistent and a bit confusing. Any reasons for such
>> behavior so I won't send a patch which breaks 100 of devices?
>
> How would you propose to write to a field without reading the rest of
> the bits in the register? Otherwise you'd be doing a full register
> write rather than just a write to the specific field.
Indeed, I forgot about bits in a field... So it has to be like this or I
need to use regmap_write(). I find the regmap field API very useful for
devices with different register layouts, but the actual "fields" part is
not really needed in my case.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists