[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0904ae71-972f-f183-f295-bce3b8518fcf@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:36:35 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
On 7/13/22 8:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   block/bio.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   35006342b739 ("block: ensure iov_iter advances for added pages")
>   248022ffae3f ("block: ensure bio_iov_add_page can't fail")
>   7b1ccdf617ca ("block: fix leaking page ref on truncated direct io")
>   9a6469060316 ("block: convert to advancing variants of iov_iter_get_pages{,_alloc}()")
> 
> from the vfs tree and commits:
> 
>   5a044eef1265 ("block: ensure iov_iter advances for added pages")
>   ac3c48e32c04 ("block: ensure bio_iov_add_page can't fail")
>   44b6b0b0e980 ("block: fix leaking page ref on truncated direct io")
> 
> from the block tree.
I pinged Al about this the other day, but haven't heard back yet. It's
not clear to me what block bits he has in his tree. We'll get it sorted
out.
-- 
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists