linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Type-C switch driver and Type-C framework updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACeCKaekD4S93XbYGOia+vuCwc+oRJpcNKVgrxEasa4MDGsSoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:02:32 -0700
From:   Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, bleung@...omium.org,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@...omium.org>,
        "Dustin L. Howett" <dustin@...ett.net>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Type-C switch driver and Type-C framework updates

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 7:15 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:22:54AM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > This series introduces a retimer class to the USB Type-C framework,
> > It also introduces a Chrome EC (Embedded Controller) switch driver which
> > registers the aforementioned retimer switches as well as mode-switches.
> >
> > Patch 1 and 2 introduce the retimer class and associated functions to
> > the Type-C common code.
> >
> > Patches 3-7 add the cros-typec-switch driver.
> >
> > Patches 8-9 update cros-ec-typec to get and use retimer switch handles.
> >
> > Submission suggestion (as always, open to better suggestions):
> > - Patch 1 and 2 can go through the USB repo.
> > - Patch 3-9 can go through the chrome-platform repo. Since they depend
> >   on patches 1 and 2, we can create an "topic branch" off of usb-next
> >   once Patch 1 and 2 are submitted, and then apply Patches 3-9 on top
> >   of that "topic branch" before merging it back into chrome-platform's
> >   for-next branch
>
> That's a mess, I can just take all of them into my tree if you want.

That works for me. Thanks for taking Patch 1 and 2; it should be fine
to apply the rest of the patches to your tree too.

Best regards,