[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtBfVoQsSZ9xLf9s@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:24:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org,
Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] regulator: output-supply DT support
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:17:12AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Please revert this. The vendor prefix is not even appropriate here and
> the binding has lots of issues. The first being whether it should even
> be in DT. It's not been reviewed as none of it has gone to the DT list
> and the only thing I got was '[PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings:
> vendor-prefixes: add 9elements'.
As discussed on the other subthread while some of this might not be an
actual problem others are causing serious concern for Rob so I've
dropped this series, it was the top commit so I just reverted the merge.
Sorry about the hassle here, hopefully the issues Rob has raised can be
addressed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists