[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12013659.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:11:26 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] intel: thermal: PCH: Drop ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
If ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 is not set, this doesn't mean that low-power
S0 idle is not usable. It merely means that using S3 on the given
system is more beneficial from the energy saving perspective than using
low-power S0 idle, as long as S3 is supported.
Suspend-to-idle is still a valid suspend mode if ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0
is not set and the pm_suspend_via_firmware() check in pch_wpt_suspend()
is sufficient to distinguish suspend-to-idle from S3, so drop the
confusing ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
@@ -207,14 +207,6 @@ static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_th
return 0;
}
- /* Do not check temperature if it is not a S0ix capable platform */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0))
- return 0;
-#else
- return 0;
-#endif
-
/* Do not check temperature if it is not s2idle */
if (pm_suspend_via_firmware())
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists